Cursor writes the pull request. IonWarp reviews it with a swarm of independent AI reviewers — code, security, performance, docs — so a small team gets the coverage of a full review team.
IonWarpbotcommented 15 min ago
IonWarp Review — PR #310
3 issues| 3 P1
#SevIssueFile
1Retry charges the same order twicebilling/checkout.ts
2Failed save still returns successapi/preferences.ts
3Reopening the editor clears saved changescomponents/editor.tsx
A timed-out response can charge the order twice · Code Review
When payment succeeds but the response times out, the caller retries the same order. Both calls charge it. Pass the stable order ID as the payment idempotency key.
Suggested fixAI fix prompt
How to review pull requests written with Cursor
Cursor's own reviewer is Bugbot: it reviews pull requests, comments on potential issues and provides fixes in the Cursor editor.[1] Since mid-2026 Bugbot is billed by usage rather than per seat, and Cursor puts the average run at $1.00–$1.50 depending on pull request size and complexity.[2]
IonWarp is a reviewer from outside the editor that wrote the code. It reviews every pull request with a swarm of specialists — Code Review, Security Review, API Performance, Docs Freshness, AI Architecture and more — each pinned to the model that measured best for its lens (Deepseek v4.1 Flash, GLM 5.3 Flash, GPT 5.6 Luna Pro). Run it on its own or next to Bugbot: the findings land on the same pull request.
Every finding carries a suggested fix and an AI fix prompt you can paste into Cursor's agent, and IonWarp re-reviews the fix and tracks each finding until it is resolved or declined. Starter is free for 3 seats; Pro is $49/mo for the whole workspace with 5 seats included.
What a second reviewer catches on Cursor-written pull requests
Duplicate code paths
A new helper or a second pathway beside the one that already exists — named on both sides.
No. Bugbot is Cursor's own reviewer, and any GitHub reviewer can review the same pull request. IonWarp installs as a GitHub app and reviews every pull request, whichever editor or agent wrote it.
Yes. Both post on the pull request. IonWarp adds specialist reviewers for security, performance, docs and architecture that review independently of the editor that wrote the code.
Each finding includes an AI fix prompt. Paste it into Cursor's agent and push the fix; IonWarp re-reviews the pull request and updates the findings ledger.
No. IonWarp works on any GitHub repository, whatever editor or coding agent your team uses.
Starter is free for 3 seats with 15,000 credits on signup. Pro is $49/mo for the whole workspace with 5 seats included; extra seats are $29/mo. Unlimited repos on every plan.
IonWarp runs a multi-domain swarm — code review, security, UX, SEO, performance, analytics — across multiple models, not one, at one workspace price: a 5-seat team pays $49/mo on Pro, with unlimited repos on every plan. Our Greptile vs CodeRabbit comparison cites each vendor's current pricing page.
Deepseek v4.1 Flash, GLM 5.3 Flash, GPT 5.6 Luna Pro. Each reviewer is pinned to the model that measured best for its lens, and the pins are re-trialed as models and prices move. On Enterprise you can bring your own keys.
Starter $0/mo (3 seats included), Pro $49/mo (5 seats included), Max $149/mo (10 seats included) — one workspace price, extra seats à la carte. Each tier unlocks a deeper review Swarm and more credits, and credits pool across your team. Unlimited repos on every plan.
Yes — Get the Max plan at half price.. Full Swarm. Proactive PRs. See the Startup discount section above.
Yes — the Learner agent tracks recurring findings and human feedback, so the same issue stops getting flagged once your team resolves the pattern. Every review sharpens the next.
Yes. Drop an agents.md in your repo and IonWarp runs your custom checks on every PR, using any model you choose. Available on Pro and Max.
GitHub Enterprise support, SSO/SAML, audit logs, a custom security review, an SLA, and a dedicated Slack channel.
Cursor Code Review: An Independent AI Reviewer Swarm — IonWarp