Skip to content
IonWarpTry Max free for 7 days
AI code review for GitHub teams

Add CI/CD Performance
to your pull requests.

Flags workflow changes that drop a cache, slow every run or weaken a gate.

IonWarpbotexample review
IonWarp Review — PR #402
3 issues| 2 P1 1 P2
#SevIssueFile
1Rust cache swapped for sccache that never persists.github/workflows/ci.yml
2Cache key hashes lockfiles inside node_modules.github/actions/setup/action.yml
3cancel-in-progress dropped from the PR workflow.github/workflows/pr.yml
.github/workflows/ci.yml
5859
−+
- uses: Swatinem/rust-cache@v2RUSTC_WRAPPER: sccache
Every run now rebuilds the whole dependency graph · CI/CD Performance

The rust-cache step is gone and sccache has no persisted backend on these runners, so nothing is cached between runs. Each job pays the full dependency build. Restore the cache step or give sccache a storage backend.

Suggested fixAI fix prompt

IonWarp caught 7 issues other models missed

Real IonWarp comments on open-source pull requests, graded against the benchmark's answer key.

Missed byGLM 5.3 Flash 1DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1GPT 5.6 Luna Pro 3Muse Spark 1.3 6

4 of 7 · See the benchmark

.github/workflows/preview.ymlherdr #4023
IonWarp caught it 3 other models missed it
IonWarpbotcommented on line 106

P1Zig cache no longer restores anything in preview/release/manual builds · CI/CD Performance

When a preview publish, release tag, or manual artifact build triggers, replacing mlugg/setup-zig with vercel-labs/setup-zig removes the action's Zig global cache, and these workflows have no actions/cache restore/save to compensate, so every run cold-compiles libghostty-vt.

MediumKnown issue in the CI/CD Performance benchmark · caught by DeepSeek V4 ProSee the graded case

DeepSeek V4 Pro is its best model on this benchmark; CI/CD Performance runs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash unless you pick another.

CI/CD Performance on the benchmark

IonWarp's models and the review apps, graded on the same open-source pull requests.

Blue: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, the model IonWarp runs for CI/CD Performance. Yellow: DeepSeek V4 Pro, the model a failed review retries on. Sorted by Reviewer Score (F1 counts 3×, time and cost 1× each). Rows not graded on every PR come last. Review times come from runs on Sep 21, 2026 (models). Click a column heading to sort.
PRs
IonWarp CI/CD Performance · DeepSeek V4 Pro
IonWarp CI/CD Performance · GLM 5.3 Flash
IonWarp CI/CD Performance · DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
IonWarp CI/CD Performance · GPT 5.6 Luna Pro
IonWarp CI/CD Performance · Muse Spark 1.3
CodeRabbit
Cursor Bugbot
Greptile v4.1
Qodo v2

On this benchmark DeepSeek V4 Pro scored higher than DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (72.7% F1 against 59.5%). Why IonWarp runs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: in a trial of our specialist reviewers on production pull requests on 23 September 2026 it filed about as many findings per review as GLM 5.3 Flash at high effort (0.93 against 1.02) for a third of the cost ($0.039 against $0.125), and 3 of its 64 findings were refuted.

Pricing

Simple pricing for your whole team.

One workspace price with seats included. Credits pool across your team. Unlimited repos on every plan.

CI/CD Performance is on Max: $149 a month with 10 seats and a 7-day trial.

Starter

$0 /mo

Try AI PR review.

  • 2 reviewers
    • Code Review
    • Security Review
  • 3 seats included
  • 15,000 credits to start, then 5,000/mo
  • Unlimited repos
Get Started

Max

$149 /mo

Scale AI PR review.

  • +9 reviewers
    • UX Review
    • API Performance
    • Analytics Review
    • SEO Review
    • Changelog
    • CI/CD Performance
    • Plan Review
    • Repeat-Failure Learnings
    • SOC 2 Review
  • 10 seats included
  • +75,000 credits/mo
  • +$29/mo per added seat
  • Unlimited repos
  • Priority support
Choose Max
Enterprise

Custom reviewers + credits · GitHub Enterprise · SSO/SAML + audit logs · Custom security review + SLA

Contact us
About CI/CD Performance