IonWarpTry for free SAST tool
Pattern rules flag a line. IonWarp's Security Review follows the change through your code and names who could abuse it and what they would get: a tenant leak, an injected command, a secret sent to a model. It lands in the same GitHub comment as Code Review, with a fix prompt for your coding agent.
A comma-joined table after a JOIN slipped past a workspace scope rewrite, so a key that could read one workspace could read every workspace's device data. The finding named the query, who could abuse it and what they would get; the coding agent fixed it in round 1.
A deploy workflow put a caller's `sha` input into a shell command unquoted, in a step that holds the deploy keys. The finding showed why the script's own check came too late: the shell expands the input first.
A new pass read a repository's deploy config files into a prompt for an outside model and redacted only the answer, so any credential in those files went to the model provider. A pattern scanner has no rule for that; the fix moved redaction before the prompt.
A path guard collapsed `..` before it resolved symlinks, so a symlink could read files outside the checkout. Security Review named the path and how to close it.
Every finding carries a fix prompt for Claude Code, Cursor or Codex. The GitHub App is read-only, so it never pushes: your agent pushes the fix, and IonWarp re-reviews and strikes the finding through as Autofixed, or keeps it open.
Every review comment ends with a table of the reviewers that ran: the model each used, what it found, what it cost and how long it took. The review shown took 115 s and 76 credits.
Save 60% vs Snyk IonWarp$49/mo |  Snyk$125/mo |  Semgrep$225/mo |  GitHub Advanced Security$245/mo |  Aikido$350/mo | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reviews pull requests for security | Security Review joins the pull requests that touch auth, input, data access or secrets | Pass/fail pull request checks; inline comments on up to 10 Snyk Code issues[1][2] | PR and MR comments, on every plan[3][4] | Dependency review and AI Scan during pull request review[5] | PR checks and inline comments from Basic up; not on Free[6][7] |
| Says how an attacker would use it | Each finding names the actor, the path and what they gain | Not listed | Not listed | Not listed | Not listed |
| Finds leaked secrets | In the pull request: keys in code, prompts, client bundles and logs — not git history | Snyk Secrets, generally available Aug 2026; the plans page prices it on Enterprise credits[8][9] | Semgrep Secrets, $15 per contributor; not on Free[3] | Secret scanning, and push protection that blocks commits with secrets[5] | Secrets detection, on every plan[6] |
| Scans a whole branch | A full-branch security audit you start from the app | Tests each imported project: 100 Snyk Code tests a month on Free, 1,000 on Team[9] | Full scans; Free covers up to 10 repositories[3] | Code scanning, in Code Security[5] | 10 repositories on Free, 100 on Basic[6] |
| Known-vulnerable dependencies | No CVE database: keep GitHub's Dependabot for packages | Snyk Open Source, on every plan[9] | Supply Chain, free for up to 10 contributors[3] | Dependabot security updates, free on every plan[10] | Dependency scanning, on every plan[6] |
| How a finding gets fixed | Your coding agent fixes it from the finding's prompt; IonWarp re-checks the push | Opens a fix pull request for each new actionable vulnerability[11] | Autofix, on every plan[3] | Copilot Autofix suggests fixes for code scanning alerts[5] | AutoFix pull requests: 10 a month on Free, unlimited from Basic[6][12] |
| Code review in the same app | Code Review on each pull request, in one comment with the security findings | Not listed | Not listed | Not listed | PR code quality checks from Basic up[6] |
| Free plan | Starter: free for 3 people | Free: 5 projects, 100 Snyk Code tests a month[9] | Code and Supply Chain free for up to 10 contributors and 10 repositories[3] | Public repositories only: secret scanning, push protection, Copilot Autofix[10] | Free for 2 users and 10 repositories[6] |
| What 5 developers pay a month | $49/mo for 5 developers — one Pro workspace with 5 seats included. | $125/mo for 5 developers — Team at $25 each, 5-developer minimum, billed monthly.[13] | $225/mo for 5 developers — Teams, Code + Secrets at $45 each, $30 for Code plus $15 for Secrets.[3] | $245/mo for 5 developers — Code Security + Secret Protection at $49 each, per active committer, on a GitHub Team or Enterprise plan.[10] | $350/mo on Basic, a flat fee that includes 10 users (US pricing).[6] |
| Git platforms | GitHub, and GitHub Enterprise on Enterprise | GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket and Azure Repos.[14] | GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket and Azure DevOps.[4] | GitHub.[5] | GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket and Azure DevOps.[7] |
Competitor facts are from each vendor's own pages, dated in the sources below. “Not listed” means the vendor's pages name no such feature; prices are for 5 developers on the team plan each price cell names.
Install the read-only GitHub App and pick your repositories. Your next pull request gets a review comment.
Starter is free for 3 people · Pro is $49/mo for 5 seats
