Skip to content
IonWarpTry for free

secret scanning

Secret scanning that catches the leaks a regex can't see.

A pattern scanner finds a string shaped like a key. IonWarp reads what the change does with it: a credential copied into a prompt for an outside model, a key bundled into client code, a token written to a log. It reviews the pull request before the merge, beside Code Review, and hands the fix to your coding agent.

  • Starter is free for 3 people
  • One team price: Pro is $49/mo for 5 seats
  • Read-only GitHub App
An IonWarp workspace home: reviews, findings fixed, pull requests approved and P0/P1 findings by day, then the open findings by severity.
52security P0/P1 findings fixedIonWarp's own pull requests, Aug 27 – Nov 2
$0.04model cost of one reviewAI Architecture · DeepSeek V4.1 Flash · 58 s

Leaks no pattern would match, from IonWarp's own pull requests

A P1 security finding on one of IonWarp's own pull requests: credentials in a repository's deploy config files are copied unredacted into a prompt for an outside model — autofixed in round 1.

Sees a secret leave through a prompt

A new pass read a repository's deploy config files into a prompt for an outside model and redacted only the answer, so any credential in those files went to the model provider. A pattern scanner has no rule for that; the fix moved redaction before the prompt.

Try for free
A P1 security finding on one of IonWarp's own pull requests: a caller-supplied workflow input is put unquoted into a shell command in a step that holds the deploy keys — autofixed in round 1.

Finds the input that reaches a shell

A deploy workflow put a caller's `sha` input into a shell command unquoted, in a step that holds the deploy keys. The finding showed why the script's own check came too late: the shell expands the input first.

Try for free
A P1 from Security Review: a path guard collapses `..` before resolving symlinks, so a symlink plus `..` reads outside the checkout — autofixed in round 1.

Names the path an attacker would take

A path guard collapsed `..` before it resolved symlinks, so a symlink could read files outside the checkout. Security Review named the path and how to close it.

Try for free
The reviewer table in an IonWarp pull-request comment: three reviewers on DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, the finding checker and the planner, with each one's cost and time — 76 credits and 115 s in all.

Keep push protection; add a reviewer that reads intent

IonWarp reviews pull requests, not git history, and it does not block a push. Keep a scanner that blocks commits with known key formats; IonWarp catches the leaks that do not look like a key.

Try for free
An IonWarp review comment in round 2: no P0 or P1 left, and a round-1 P1 struck through and marked Autofixed with its commit.

Your agent closes it; IonWarp checks the fix

Every finding carries a fix prompt for Claude Code, Cursor or Codex. The GitHub App is read-only, so it never pushes: your agent pushes the fix, and IonWarp re-reviews and strikes the finding through as Autofixed, or keeps it open.

Try for free

IonWarp and the secret scanning tools teams compare

Save 80% vs GitHub Advanced SecurityIonWarp$49/moGitHub Advanced Security$245/moAikido$350/moSemgrep$225/moSnyk$125/mo
Reviews pull requests for securitySecurity Review joins the pull requests that touch auth, input, data access or secretsDependency review and AI Scan during pull request review[1]PR checks and inline comments from Basic up; not on Free[2][3]PR and MR comments, on every plan[4][5]Pass/fail pull request checks; inline comments on up to 10 Snyk Code issues[6][7]
Says how an attacker would use itEach finding names the actor, the path and what they gainNot listedNot listedNot listedNot listed
Finds leaked secretsIn the pull request: keys in code, prompts, client bundles and logs — not git historySecret scanning, and push protection that blocks commits with secrets[1]Secrets detection, on every plan[2]Semgrep Secrets, $15 per contributor; not on Free[4]Snyk Secrets, generally available Aug 2026; the plans page prices it on Enterprise credits[8][9]
Scans a whole branchA full-branch security audit you start from the appCode scanning, in Code Security[1]10 repositories on Free, 100 on Basic[2]Full scans; Free covers up to 10 repositories[4]Tests each imported project: 100 Snyk Code tests a month on Free, 1,000 on Team[9]
Known-vulnerable dependenciesNo CVE database: keep GitHub's Dependabot for packagesDependabot security updates, free on every plan[10]Dependency scanning, on every plan[2]Supply Chain, free for up to 10 contributors[4]Snyk Open Source, on every plan[9]
How a finding gets fixedYour coding agent fixes it from the finding's prompt; IonWarp re-checks the pushCopilot Autofix suggests fixes for code scanning alerts[1]AutoFix pull requests: 10 a month on Free, unlimited from Basic[2][11]Autofix, on every plan[4]Opens a fix pull request for each new actionable vulnerability[12]
Code review in the same appCode Review on each pull request, in one comment with the security findingsNot listedPR code quality checks from Basic up[2]Not listedNot listed
Free planStarter: free for 3 peoplePublic repositories only: secret scanning, push protection, Copilot Autofix[10]Free for 2 users and 10 repositories[2]Code and Supply Chain free for up to 10 contributors and 10 repositories[4]Free: 5 projects, 100 Snyk Code tests a month[9]
What 5 developers pay a month$49/mo for 5 developers — one Pro workspace with 5 seats included.$245/mo for 5 developers — Code Security + Secret Protection at $49 each, per active committer, on a GitHub Team or Enterprise plan.[10]$350/mo on Basic, a flat fee that includes 10 users (US pricing).[2]$225/mo for 5 developers — Teams, Code + Secrets at $45 each, $30 for Code plus $15 for Secrets.[4]$125/mo for 5 developers — Team at $25 each, 5-developer minimum, billed monthly.[13]
Git platformsGitHub, and GitHub Enterprise on EnterpriseGitHub.[1]GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket and Azure DevOps.[3]GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket and Azure DevOps.[5]GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket and Azure Repos.[14]

Competitor facts are from each vendor's own pages, dated in the sources below. “Not listed” means the vendor's pages name no such feature; prices are for 5 developers on the team plan each price cell names.

Sources

  1. About GitHub Advanced SecurityGitHub Docs · read
  2. PricingAikido Security · read
  3. AutoFix Suggestions and Inline Commenting for PR ChecksAikido help · read
  4. Pricing and PlansSemgrep · read
  5. Supported source code managersSemgrep docs · read
  6. Pull Request checksSnyk docs · read
  7. Pull Request experienceSnyk docs · read
  8. Snyk Secrets Now Generally AvailableSnyk · read
  9. Snyk Plans and PricingSnyk · read
  10. GitHub Advanced Security plansGitHub · read
  11. Automatic Creation of Pull RequestsAikido help · read
  12. Enable automatic Fix PRsSnyk docs · read
  13. Get started with your Snyk Team planSnyk · read
  14. SCMsSnyk docs · read

Review your next pull request for leaked secrets

Install the read-only GitHub App and pick your repositories. Your next pull request gets a review comment.

Starter is free for 3 people · Pro is $49/mo for 5 seats

An IonWarp workspace home: reviews, findings fixed, pull requests approved and P0/P1 findings by day, then the open findings by severity.