Skip to content
IonWarpTry for free

accessibility testing

Accessibility testing in the pull request, on your preview deployment.

IonWarp's UX Review opens the preview deployment of a pull request at desktop and phone widths, works the changed screens with the keyboard and the accessibility tree, and posts what broke beside Code Review: a control with no accessible name, focus lost after a dialog, a menu hidden from screen readers.

Try for free What it checks
  • UX Review is on Max: $149/mo for 10 seats
  • Max is free for 7 days
  • Needs a public preview URL for the pull request
An IonWarp workspace home: reviews, findings fixed, pull requests approved and P0/P1 findings by day, then the open findings by severity.
1,686findings fixed in 30 daysIonWarp's own repository, Sep 4 – Oct 4
$0.04model cost of one reviewAI Architecture · DeepSeek V4.1 Flash · 58 s

Accessibility checks on every preview it opens

  • Code ReviewEvery plan
  • Security ReviewEvery plan
  • AI ArchitecturePro
  • API PerformanceMax
  • Docs ReviewPro
  • SEO ReviewMax
  • Analytics ReviewMax
  • UX ReviewMax

Checks the screens the pull request changed

UX Review opens the preview and checks what a person can see and operate: accessible names, keyboard focus, what screen readers can reach, and layout that clips or covers a button on a phone.

  • Desktop and phone widths
  • The keyboard and the accessibility tree
  • Findings in the same GitHub comment
Try for free
The latest pull requests on the workspace home, each with the reviewers that ran and Ready to merge or Review incomplete.

Catches regressions; it does not certify compliance

It tells you what a change broke before it merges. It does not certify WCAG conformance or replace a manual audit; it keeps the next pull request from undoing the work an audit paid for.

Try for free
An IonWarp review comment in round 2: no P0 or P1 left, and a round-1 P1 struck through and marked Autofixed with its commit.

Your agent fixes it; IonWarp checks again

Each finding carries a fix prompt for Claude Code, Cursor or Codex. When the fix is pushed, IonWarp re-reviews and strikes the finding through as Autofixed, or keeps it open.

Try for free
The reviewer table in an IonWarp pull-request comment: three reviewers on DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, the finding checker and the planner, with each one's cost and time — 76 credits and 115 s in all.

Each reviewer's model, cost and time

Every review comment ends with a table of the reviewers that ran: the model each used, what it found, what it cost and how long it took. The review shown took 115 s and 76 credits.

Try for free
The reviewer catalog: each reviewer's card with what it checks, the model it runs, and an on/off switch.

Turn reviewers on and pick their models

Each reviewer has a card with what it checks and the model it runs. Switch one on or off, or change its model, for each repository.

Try for free

Test your next pull request's preview

Install the read-only GitHub App and pick your repositories. Your next pull request gets a review comment.

Try for free Compare plans

UX Review is on Max: $149/mo for 10 seats · Max is free for 7 days

An IonWarp workspace home: reviews, findings fixed, pull requests approved and P0/P1 findings by day, then the open findings by severity.